You are viewing an archive of a previous version of Click here to browse current articles or return to the main site.

Fed's ZIRP is Damaging Savers

Fedís ZIRP is Damaging Savers
By Ron DeLegge, Editor
June 21, 2012

The Fed doesnít care about fixed income investors. Stark as that may seem, itís true.

Since 2008, the Fed has manipulated interest rates to near zero percent, thereby depressing the yields on fixed income investments like bonds (NYSEArca: AGG) and savings accounts. And the Fedís extension of Operation Twist through the end of this year is more of the same.

Hereís the translation: Savers are being penalized, speculators are being rewarded.

On June 1, the yield on 10-Year Treasury (NYSEArca: IEF) notes fell to a record low of 1.43%.
The best 7-day yield on a retail money market fund (Nasdaq: FSLXX), according to Crane Data, is a paltry 0.10%. Tax exempt money funds (Nasdaq: MOFXX) yield slightly more, but mounting muni credit risk has everybody but Paul Krugman rightly on edge.

A top yielding 5-year certificate of depression (CD) will snag you around 1.69%. At that interest rate, itíll take you approximately 42 years to double your money.

As a result, conservative income investors, at a record rate, are piling into volatile but high yielding asset classes like junk bonds (NYSEArca: HYG), preferred stock (NYSEArca: PFF), exotic emerging market debt (NYSEArca: PCY) and other high risk areas they wouldnít have dreamed of touching in past years. The net cash flow into HYG, which tracks low rated corporate bonds, has more than doubled over the past year!

History doesnít always repeat itself, but it often rhymes.  

People who chased yields in highly leveraged mortgage REITs (NYSEArca: REM) got crushed when the group collapsed by 42% in value in 2008, not to mention the wave of dividend cuts they suffered. Before that time, mortgage REITs were sold as a reliable source of income. 

Hereís the message: Investors better come up with a better game plan for generating adequate income. You donít necessarily need to take more risk, but rather, you need to look in the right places.

Our $100,000 all ETF Income Mix Portfolio has generated $5,900 in monthly income over the past six months, not including dividends. The expense ratio average for this portfolio is a rock bottom 0.18%, which is five times less compared to a comparable mutual fund portfolio.

By using the right combination of ETFs, options, and dividend income, getting better monthly cash flow is possible, despite the Federal Reserveís monetary nonsense.


CommentsAdd Comment

JERRYG said on July 05, 2012
  One thing that bothers me is how the Fed keeps saying it does things to benefit the U.S. economy. That's a bunch of hogwash. The Fed does things to benefit itself and its bankers. Also, Why is Jamie Dimon still on the board of the New York Fed? Does JPMorgan need to destroy another $2 billion before he's axed?
Your Name:
Your Email: (Email will not be displayed anywhere)
Verification Code: